At Cal/EPA, they care deeply about California’s environment, and like so many of us Californian’s, Cal/EPA also believes it is vitally important that we teach our next generation how their actions will directly affect the environment. The state has a groundbreaking Education and the Environment Initiative (EEI) Curriculum that is vital to our state’s future.
It is the EEI’s vision to bring environmental literacy to all California classrooms. 90 percent of California parents share this vision, according to a recent PPIC poll. The California Department of Education and Legislation directed Cal/EPA to create the EEI curriculum. The lessons were subjected to multiple levels of expert and field-testing, independent review, and public comment. In order to ensure that the EEI text is factually accurate, free of bias, academically rigorous and engaging to students, the state went to great lengths.
It was revealed last summer that the plastics industry heavily influenced some changes to the proposed Cal/EPA Environmental Education Curriculum. One High School lesson plan titled “Consequences of Consumption” was changed after the industry made some suggestions:
“In 2009, Gerald Lieberman, a private consultant hired by California school officials, added a new section to the 11th-grade teachers’ edition textbook called ‘The Advantages of Plastic Shopping Bags.’ In one instance, the title and some of the textbook language were inserted almost verbatim from letters written by the American Chemistry Council.
Although the curriculum includes the environmental hazards of plastic bags, the consultant also added a five-point question to a workbook asking students to list some advantages. According to the revised teachers’ edition, the correct answer is: ‘Plastic shopping bags are very convenient to use. They take less energy to manufacture than paper bags, cost less to transport and can be reused.’ ”
When this story broke, it caught the immediate attention of concerned parents as well as environmentalists all over the state. State Senator Fran Pavley, who authored legislation that led to the creation of the curriculum noted, “The American Chemistry Council obviously got engaged to protect their bottom line.”
On May 4th, Cal/EPA announced a new and improved set of changes. The comment period ends on June 4th.
According to the Cal/EPA website: “These improvements are geared toward ensuring the text is academically rigorous, free of bias, reflective of instructional best practices, and factually accurate (e.g., all statistics reflect the best information available at this time).”
We are all pleased to see that the test question, “What are the advantages of using plastic shopping bags?” has been reworded to “What factors have contributed to the consumption of plastic shopping bags?”. In addition, the recycling rate of plastic bags is also more accurately stated (3% in 2009 according to CalRecycle and not the 12% in the original version). Best of all, the “Advantages of Plastic Shopping Bags” section has been removed entirely in this version.
We must continue to educate future generations about the severe environmental (among others) impact of the use of plastic bags. In addition, we all need to remember…just one reusable bag can replace hundreds or even thousands of single use plastic bags over the course of its lifetime. Most are fully recyclable and some are even biodegradable.
Comments(0)